Ochoa solidifies No. 1 ranking

Golf Betting Lines

04/27/2009 - Philadelphia, PA (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Lorena Ochoa claimed her second win of the season Sunday at the Corona Championship and strengthened her hold on the No. 1 ranking in women's golf.

Ochoa went from 13.72 average points to 14.47 in this week's rankings, upping her lead over second-ranked Yani Tseng to 5.61 points. That's an increase from 4.80 points last week.

The first 11 players in the rankings all held onto their spots from last week, with Ochoa and Tseng being followed by Jiyai Shin, Paula Creamer, Suzann Pettersen, Cristie Kerr, Angela Stanford, Karrie Webb, Helen Alfredsson, Katherine Hull and Seon-Hwa Lee.

Na Yeon Choi finished third behind Ochoa and Pettersen in Mexico and moved up eight places to 12th.

Eun-Hee Ji, Yuri Fudoh, Angela Park, Jeong Jang, Jee Young Lee, Maria Hjorth, Hee-Won Han and In Kyung Kim round out the top 20 this week. Fudoh, Park, Jang, Hjorth, Han and Kim all lost ground in the rankings.

Acyberbet Golf Betting News


<< Breaking Down the Kentucky Derby - Part II
Philadelphia, PA (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - This second installment of "Breaking Down the Kentucky Derby" involves six horses that have a small chance of upsetting the top five favorites, who will be highlighted later this week. I have already disse

<< Chelsea must cope with Messi situation
Barcelona, Spain (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - It is no secret that Barcelona possesses one of the deadliest offensive attacks in the world. And as Chelsea prepares to meet this offensive juggernaut at the Nou Camp on Tuesday in the first leg of

<< This Week in Golf - April 30th through May 3rd
Philadelphia, PA (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - PGA TOUR - QUAIL HOLLOW CHAMPIONSHIP, Quail Hollow Club, Charlotte, North Carolina - Tiger Woods will make his fifth start of the season this week at the Quail Hollow Championship. Woods, who hasn't played

<< Kirilenko drops Fes opener
Fes, Morocco (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Fourth-seeded Russian Maria Kirilenko was one of two first-round losers Monday at the $220,000 Moroccan Grand Prix. Poland's Marta Domachowska upended Kirilenko in 6-4, 6-4 fashion on the red clay at Fes R

<< Kelly moves to No. 78 in world rankings
Philadelphia, PA (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Jerry Kelly ended his seven-year winless drought with a victory Sunday at the Zurich Classic of New Orleans, earning the 42-year-old a 63-place bump to No. 78 in this week's world rankings. Ahead of K

Bulls G Gordon has injured hamstring, may miss Game 5 >>
Chicago, IL (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - The Chicago Bulls announced Monday that guard Ben Gordon suffered a strained left hamstring in Sunday's double-overtime win against Boston and is day-to-day. Gordon left Sunday's 121-118 triumph in Game 4 of

Boise State RB Johnson among 14 signed by Vikings >>
Eden Prairie, MN (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - The Minnesota Vikings agreed to terms with 14 rookie free agents on Monday with former Boise State running back Ian Johnson among them. Johnson rushed for 766 yards and 13 touchdowns as

Wawrinka rolls; Blake falls in rainy Rome >>
Rome, Italy (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Tenth-seeded Swiss Stanislas Wawrinka was a first-round winner, while 14th-seeded American James Blake came up a loser Monday at the $3.645 million Italian Masters tennis event. The 2008 Rome runner-up

Missouri QB Daniel highlights 13 signed by Redskins >>
Ashburn, VA (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - The Washington Redskins agreed to terms with 13 rookie free agents on Monday, including standout Missouri quarterback Chase Daniel. Daniel threw for 4,335 yards and posted a 72.9 completion percentage with

Bengals get rid of Perry, four others >>
Cincinnati, OH (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - The Cincinnati Bengals terminated the contract of running back Chris Perry, one of several roster moves by the club on Monday. The former 2004 first-round pick of the Bengals, Perry gained 269 yard

How did changes to college football betting rules affect bettors?

The 2007 college football rules changes that were implemented to shorten games are now history. The NCAA rules committee did what they set out to do; games were cut by an average of 14 minutes per game last season. There were also, on average, 14 fewer plays per game. We’ll get into how that did (or didn’t) affect games in regards to the pointspread a bit later.

While the NCAA rules committee may have had the betterment of the game in mind, they'll now “turn back the clock” for next season. Two key rules have now been overturned by the NCAA committee for the 2007 season, something definitely for the better.

For those of you who may not remember what those rules actually were, let us refresh your memory.

1) The first one was actually starting the clock on a kickoff as soon as the kicker touched the ball rather than waiting until the returner touched it. The problem here was near the end of the half (or game), if the team leading was kicking off, they could milk the clock by intentionally running offsides and then re-kicking. They could run 10-15 seconds off the clock each play while taking just five-yard penalties each time. They could run the clock down and simply cause the half (or game) to end on a kickoff, keeping the opposing offense off the field. In 2007, the clock will now start when the returner touches the ball as it had before last season.

2) The second rule dealt with starting the clock after a change of online football betting possession rather than waiting until the ball was snapped. This took a lot of time off the clock throughout the game as teams changed possession, however it caused the most problems late in games (or halves). Rather than huddling up and calling a play, the offensive team would have to rush onto the field as the clock started. This was a definite disadvantage to a team that was trying to come from behind late in the game. This year the clock will start on a change of possession, after the ball is snapped.

How did those rules affect the college game last year and will it make a difference this year when it comes to the pointspread? We commonly heard two theories when it came to these changes. First, it would affect scoring negatively. Second, it would hurt favorites as they would have less time and fewer plays to cover the number.

Did the rules hurt scoring? Yes. It seemed obvious that shortening the game by what amounted to 14 plays would push scoring downward. That was the case last year. Of the 119 Division 1A teams, 69 squads scored fewer points in 2007 than they did in 2005. Just 48 teams had a higher PPG scoring average and two stayed the same. Almost 59 percent of the teams in college football last year had a lower PPG average than they did in 2005. Expect more scoring in 2007 as we revert back to the old rules.

Did the rules hinder favorites from covering the number in 2007? Not really. Last year the favorites posted an overall spread record of 336-350-16 (48.9 percent). The year before, favorites were 316-326-13 (49.2 percent). In 2004, the favorites were 316-339-2 (48.2 percent). In fact, college football favorites have been above 50 percent for the season just once in the last seven years (in 2003). Last year’s numbers fell right in line with where they have been historically.

How about big favorites? The rules must have hurt them? Maybe a little bit. Double-digit favorites last year came in at a 47.8 percent clip compare with an average of just over 50 percent over the last seven years. Since 1980, favorites of -10 or more have covered at exactly a 50 percent clip (measured over 6,716 games).

Even bigger favorites must have struggled? Not really. In fact, it was just the opposite. Favorites of three TD’s or more were 59-54-2 last year (52.2 percent). Since 2000, those same favorites (-21 or higher) hit at 51.3 percent and since 1990 came in a clip of 50.3 percent. Stepping it up a notch to four TD favorites or higher, we actually see they've covered at a much better rate last season than before. Last year, favorites of -28 or more were 31-21-1, or almost 60 percent. Historically, four-TD-or-higher favorites have come in at a 50.7 percent spot since 2000 and only 48.9 percent since 1990. The “perceived” problem with the favorites covering at a reduced rate really never came to fruition.

Bottom line is, there might be some more scoring in 2007, but no real revelations when it comes to finding any pointspread golden nuggets.

To visit this online sportsbook got to MySportsbook.com for all your bet on college football needs. Mysportsbook.com online sportsbook accepts Visa and Mastercard credit cards.